The 2008 US Presidential election garnered interest around the world, demonstrated by the 50 individuals across Eurasia who logged in to an IATP forum to learn about the role of students and Web 2.0 technologies in the election and preceding campaign.
The forum (forum.iatp.net), which took place from November 24-December 12, featured Executive Director of the Minnesota Public Interest Research Group (MPIRG) Joshua Winters and two active MPIRG members, students Ryan Kennedy and Joey Dobson. The three guests shared best practices of involving university and college students in voting and in MPIRG activities. MPIRG is a non-profit, student-directed organization that empowers students to engage in their communities and to take collective action in the public interest throughout the state of Minnesota. Participants from Eurasia included students, teachers, journalists, NGO representatives, and other interested parties from Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
IATP users posed questions on topics such as organizing advocacy campaigns with students and NGO officials, tracking legislative activity, utilizing Web 2.0 in electoral campaigns, and documenting student voting statistics. Winters noted that “Facebook, online text messaging tools, and MPIRG’s website became information dissemination vehicles and ways of capturing contact information so that we could follow up with additional educational opportunities, reminders to vote, and answers to questions about the voting process. There simply is no substitute for direct, in-person contact with young people. All of the studies done here in US that identify what motivates young people support this conclusion.” The guest expert also dispelled the myth widely believed in Eurasia that Americans vote largely by the internet. He noted the various security reasons, as well as challenges relating to voter identity verification, that hinder such a change.
During the course of the online discussion, the Eurasian participants also learned the American experts’ strategies to educate and motivate young people, and tactics to coordinate election campaigns among students. For example, commenting on the role of free discussions and conversations, Dobson said, “I believe strongly that open conversations between those with differing viewpoints can often be the most fruitful way to expand our understanding of the issues we care about. That mindset allowed me to refrain from telling my peers how I thought they should vote, and instead, engage in generative discussions about what we would like to see in a candidate and how we think our country needs to move forward.”
NGO officials interacting in the forum also learned from their US colleagues about the role of NGOs in campaigns. The MPIRG representatives discussed the sorts of NGOs active in elections, the limitations on their activities, and some of MPIRG’s successes in local advocacy campaigns.
Last year, IATP organized more than ten international expert-moderated online forums to share expertise with their Eurasian counterparts.